Your results are very interesting, but it would still be more interesting to see some analysis of the runtimes.
Why does it save to *not* use ASDF for loading? Is it * the preparation of the system (handling the configuration files and locating all the .asd's)? * the call to TRAVERSE to build the load plan? or * the checking of file write dates inside PERFORM-PLAN? Do you have any information about this? cheers, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
