On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Tobias C Rittweiler <[email protected]> wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, > Robert Goldman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 5/24/12 May 24 -4:13 AM, Tobias C Rittweiler wrote: >> > Hi there! >> > >> > Thanks to the ASDF maintainers. I just visited ASDF's website >> > on common-lisp.net since a long time, and it makes a nicely >> > maintained impression! Well done. >> > >> > I have the following issues: >> > >> > * The rather old ASDF version that I'm using ("2.010") does >> > not seem to be able to cope with multiple :depends-on clauses. >> > (Only one clause seems to be used.) >> > >> > Is this intended behaviour? Might it be fixed in more recent >> > versions? >> >> Tobias, does ASDF just take the first and quietly throw later ones on >> the floor, or does it at least emit an error message? If it emits an >> error message, I think it's ok. But if it quietly discards the second >> clause, I think it's a bug, and we should make ASDF warn the programmer. >> I'd encourage you to post a launchpad bug in that case. >> >> Sorry to bother asking you instead of just testing --- I'm traveling and >> not in a good position to test anything. Similarly not a great time for >> me to make launchpad bugs. >> >> cheers, >> r > > Yes ignoring the second clause was what happened on SBCL. > > I will submit a ticket. > I don't know that it's a bug. As Stelian mentioned, we're using destructuring-bind and/or apply 'make-instance, and that's the normal behavior in these cases. I think we should just document this behavior, and NOT try to catch and raise an error in the case of repeated keys.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org To fight a violent enemy, violence is necessary; but to fight violence itself, violence is vain. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
