rpgoldman: > I think, if we remove :if-component-dep-fails and replace it with > something better (a choice I heartily applaud), and also add your > prepare-op, that sounds to me like a big enough change to the API to > warrant calling this ASDF 3 sometime soon.... > > There are enough API differences that I think being able to say > > #+asdf3 > > might be useful... > Problem: asdf's current versioning scheme will declare that asdf 3 is incompatible with asdf 2, so anyone who tries (asdf:version-satifies "3.0" "2.26") is in for a big disappointment.
As long as we reasonably don't break compatibility, I propose we keep the asdf 2 series going indefinitely. And if we are going to break compatibility, we know where to find xcvb, quick-build, etc. — Question authority! — Yeah, says who? _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
