Faré <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Zach Beane <[email protected]> wrote: >> Faré <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Sure. Which format do you prefer? >>> If I remember correctly, you will want a directory asdf-driver-2.26.100/ >>> containing the code. >> >> Either format is fine. Sometimes a tarball implies a level of release >> engineering. >> > That begs the question: how should asdf be distributed?
Does it? I thought we were talking about asdf-driver. > As asdf.lisp only? Yes. As it always has been. Zach _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
