On Jan 21, 2013, at 20:08, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > ABCL is one of the three implementations, together with CLISP and CMUCL, > where I ultimately punted on ASDF hot-upgrade, by just trying to > rename away the ASDF package if it's too old. > > I don't know if you're interested in making the kind of package > surgery I was indulging in work, > but it involves rehoming symbols from ASDF to subpackages such as > ASDF/COMPONENT, > including for class slot names.
Hi Fare, I appreciate your work on asdf, and bug reports are always good. If you can describe your problems as a sequence of forms that we can type in to observe breakage, things shouldn't be too hard to fix. It would be cool to have an abcl that can support all of asdf. Rudi _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
