I think the whole "temporary package" thing is a failure, and we
should just have
an ASDF-USER package that uses ASDF.

Does anyone have any objection to having .asd files be loaded in
a shared ASDF-USER rather than a temporary ASDF~D package?

If you want to define your own private functions in their private namespace,
there's defpackage for you.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
There are two types of people in the world:
People who think there are two kinds of people, and people who don't.

_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Reply via email to