21.02.2013, 21:24, "Anton Vodonosov" <[email protected]>: > 21.02.2013, 20:55, "Faré" <[email protected]>: > >> OK, so I contacted each and every maintainer for the systems with >> warnings, and already got a few of them fixed. Now to test the systems >> enabled by UTF-8, and see if any have warnings. >> >> Anton, can you make a run with ASDF 2.26 + utf-8, then a run with ASDF >> 2.29 + utf-8 + warnings, so we can see the difference? > > 2.26 vs 2.29? You mean 2.29 in both cases I believe. We already have > asdf.2.29.5-utf8-no-warn, so we only need to perform asdf.2.29.5-utf8. > > Will start do now.
SBCL results arrived: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-14.html This table includes both warning-caused failures you saw already and new ones, not visible before because compilation failed even without deferred warnings due to encoding. I must leave now, later will try to separate the failures to leave only new ones. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
