> Or I could rely on SBCL being used a whole lot and indeed having > immutable such default syntax tables with understandable messages > to blame whoever tries to mutate those tables without rebinding them
this approach seems to be the most straightforward to me. especially since we have that great cl-test-grid running on multiple lisps, one of which is sbcl which will catch the wrongdoers. i'd also argue that it's also a potential time waster if asdf rebinds a copy and someone foolhardy tries to modify *readtable*, and will experience zero sideffects contrary to his expectations. he will waste his own time only, so it's already much better, but still not ideal. -- attila Notice the erosion of your (digital) freedom, and do something about it! PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
