Dave Cooper <david.coo...@genworks.com> writes: > This is with no (in-package ...) form at the beginning. > > In any case, it looks like as long as the .asd files are used as intended, > then no package prefix is needed on the (defsystem ...), and no (in-package > ...) is needed at the top (when using any ASDF version). > > I think the confusion started at a time when we were, for some reason, > manually loading .asd files ourselves by calling (load ...), ...
Not for me - I had problems with indentation when using plain (defsystem ...) and no problems with (asdf:defsystem ...), so I always used the latter. Zach _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
