Dear Dave, when I fixed the dependencies for monolithic-fasl-op in 2.32.13, I failed to make an according change to the perform method. I fixed the issue *and* I added a test case in the test suite.
My apologies for the breakage. PS: there is no copy-directory for now. On Unix, I use run-program to invoke cp or rsync, that come with lots of options that are hard to reproduce. On Windows, I suppose you could try xcopy. A full-fledged cp or rsync replacement and/or wrapper is out of the scope of uiop, but would make a nice Lisp library. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Free Will: decisions are determined by processes located in individual brains and unpredictable by either same or other individuals. God-given souls, pixie dust, (quantum) non-determinism, mystic animal spirits and other magic sources of "free will" need not apply. On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Dave Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Faré, > > Looks like there is a strange regression, at least on acl-9.0-linux-x86 and > acl-9.0m-linux-x86: > > The --all-systems file is not being written at all! I get this: > > http://paste.lisp.org/display/136095 > > The (asdf:component-depends-on ...) does look like it gives the correct > order, though. (What is the canonical function to see the list which will be > written out by asdf/bundle:monolithic-fasl-op? I remember you said it's not > really component-depends-on -- so what is it again? > > By the way, I just made a branch of github.com/genworks/gendl.git called > asdf-monofasl-broken which has that extra source/try.lisp file and the > :component for it in the gendl.asd file, for github.com/genworks/gendl.git. > > I tried this on acl-9.0-linux-x86, acl-9.0m-linux-x86, and > ccl-1.9-f96-macosx-x64. > > Thanks for the work on this so far, please let me know if there is anything > else I can do. > > > Regards, > > Dave > > P.S. Thanks for the uiop/filesystem:delete-directory-tree, I will use it > with caution. > > P.P.S. Is there a recursive copy-directory? I didn't see one at first > glance. > > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear Dave, >> >> I fixed in 2.32.13 the bug you found with monolithic-fasl-op. >> It was a subtle bug in dependency propagation, >> that was ultimately rooted in the incorrect decision of >> having the monolithic bundle operations inherit from the non-monolithic >> ones. >> This imposed contradictory constraints on the code, >> which prevented it from doing the right thing in all cases, >> with the current code kind of working in the common case, >> but not quite in other not-so-uncommon cases, as you discovered. >> >> Thanks for your bug report, and my apologies for taking a few days >> before I sorted it all out. >> >> As a bonus, 2.32.12 included a few utilities like >> delete-empty-directory and delete-directory-tree >> that should help you get rid of cl-fad. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
