On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Zach Beane <x...@xach.com> wrote: > Faré <fah...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Inferior-shell *should* be able to compile with ASDF 2. >> If not, it's a bug. Meh: not as easy for me to test as I'd like. > > It uses the slash/package name thing. I'm not sure when it was > introduced, but my build system doesn't understand it. > Autodetection of foo/bar as meaning "read it from foo.asd" is an asdf3-ism, but systems named like that work on asdf2 (and asdf1) just like any other system defined in a .asd — of which there used to be a lot even before this convention was invented. i.e. once defined asdf can use them, but before the .asd file is loaded asdf1&2 have no idea where to look for them.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Only a fool tests the depth of the water with both feet. — African proverb
