On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 14:04 -0400, Faré wrote: > Yes, this is probably a bug. In register-system-definition, we should > get the force argument, and propagate to a variant of load-systems > that itself should take keyword arguments, and is called by > load-systems.
I gather you're talking about the first issue. What about the second one ? > Regarding swap-bytes, there may (or may not) be useful stuff in > sb-rotate-bytes and nibbles. swap-bytes is a complement to sb-rotate-bytes and nibbles does something completely different. -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
