Thanks a lot Anton. Robert, is there any blocker to release?
Anton, would you have time to run the tests with the deferred-warnings enabled? With :uiop in the use-list of :asdf-user? —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted before. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodono...@yandex.ru> wrote: > 27.01.2014, 11:04, "Faré" <fah...@gmail.com>: >> >> Anton: can you run cl-test-grid against that? >> If you have time, also try with (uiop:enable-deferred-warnings-check) >> and also try with :uiop in the :use list of :asdf-user. > > > I have results for ASDF 3.1.0.63 for these lisps: > > abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86 > ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86 > clisp-2.49-unix-x86 > cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 > ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode > ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c > sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86 > > No regressions found so far. > > The report: > http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-28.html > > It compares the ASDF 3.1.0.63 results to the results with > original ASDF versions coming with these lisps, on quicklisp 2013-12-13. > All the failures we see here were discussed previously, they are not ASDF > problems (quicklisp bug + the strange CCL:SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS on CCL > when building cl-l10n). > > I am running more tests, will follow up here when results are ready. > > Best regards, > - Anton