I'm expecting asdf to suddenly see asd files that it shouldn't. (In my configuration, only ~/lisp/develop/ contains "active" systems, the rest of ~/lisp may contain "inactive" ones - for example, alternate versions of the same systems.)
Pascal Sent from my iPad > On 12 Mar 2014, at 08:04, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Pascal Costanza <p...@p-cos.net> wrote: >> This has the potential of messing up already existing configurations >> (again!). The choice of ~/lisp would certainly mess up mine, and I can >> imagine many other scenarios. Please don't do that. > I'm not sure what you mean by "messing up" your configuration. > > How would it mess your configuration? > > Do you have plenty of conflicting .asd's there that are going to > shadow those you like and each other? > > Or are you expecting many seconds of scanning through deep directory > structures that may or may not contain .asd files? > > Because adding them to the list is otherwise a NOP if the directories > don't exist or don't contain .asd files. > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > He who says he will die for a cause will probably lie for it and may kill > for it. — John McCarthy
