On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodono...@yandex.ru> wrote: > The tests on 3.1.0.94 have completed. > > No regressions detected, here is the report: > http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-37.html > > The only failure is teepeedee2, which fails because of its own problem > - it includes in its source code libraries like babel, incompatible > with babel from quicklisp. > > The lisps tested: > abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86 > abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86 > ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86 > clisp-2.49-unix-x86 > cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 > ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode > ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c > sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86 > > I am now preparing to test the patch. Fare, you say on the lates > SBCL, therefore I have build sbcl-1.1.16. Will test on it. > Thanks a lot! The quality of ASDF releases just wouldn't be the same without you.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Demand Truly Free Health Care: where doctors need neither pay, food, sleep nor training, and hospitals grow on trees!