Attila Lendvai wrote: > this reminds me of the general idea of backwards compatibility: people > who want to live without this feature can chose not to upgrade, as > always. or if they need the new stuff, then they can just patch asdf > locally to disable the enforcement of this. or asdf could even > accommodate this with a defsystem property that can opt a system out > of this otherwise useful isolation.
Yes, that is right; please see my earlier email with next steps: 1. The READTABLE isolation feature WILL NOT BE IN THE NEW RELEASE. 2. When/if it is released, the READTABLE isolation feature will only be an *opt-in* strict mode item. Thanks! R
