Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 05:02 CEST, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote:
>
>> A remaining problem is that now getting an ASDF development environment
>> starts to be more difficult. How are we to manage installing the
>> dependencies if the ASDF development head is going to be *ahead* of the
>> state of Quicklisp (and, I believe now, *incompatibly* ahead)?
>
> Trying to set up a build environment for the minimakefile branch, I also
> had to hunt the dependencies.
I had the same trouble for the original makefile, which I resolved by
setting up this environment variable:
export
ASDF_DEVEL_SOURCE_REGISTRY="${HOME}/lisp/vendor/fare-utils:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/inferior-shell:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/fare-quasiquote:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/fare-mop:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/cl-ppcre:${HOME}/lisp/closer-mop:${HOME}/lisp/asdf//:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/named-readtables/:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/optima/:${HOME}/lisp/vendor/alexandria:"
The makefile checks for this environment variable (line 35):
ifdef ASDF_DEVEL_SOURCE_REGISTRY
export CL_SOURCE_REGISTRY = ${ASDF_DEVEL_SOURCE_REGISTRY}
endif
Probably something similar could be done in the minimakefile branch
(although let's *not* share the same environment variable name!).
I don't see that it's necessary for you to use the minimakefile branch,
although I certainly don't object to your doing so, if you prefer to.
Best,
r
_______________________________________________
Asdf-devel mailing list
Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
