On Aug 26, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote:
> Ben Hyde wrote:
>> Would changing (:tree <path>) so it accepts an optional argument be less
>> adhoc?
>>
>> Possibly (:tree <path> &key (depth nil)
>> (don-not-recure-after-asdf-encountered nil))
>>
>> That said this would have little if any value in my use case. I point
>> ask it to sweep over my
>> the directory where all my coding lives, and most of the directories in
>> there are not lisp, and so
>> there ain’t any asd files in those.
>
> I think the problem with this is that, as Fare points out, it's the
> author of the system who has laid out the directory tree
your both quite wise, i agree
_______________________________________________
Asdf-devel mailing list
Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
