Jean-Claude Beaudoin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info > <mailto:rpgold...@sift.info>> wrote: > > > This morning I pulled an update from the mkcl git repo, rebuilt on my > Linux Mint machine, and retested with the latest ASDF. All the tests > that completed seemed to complete successfully, but test-program.script > hung, instead of completing. > > ... > > The block of the test that fails is "test program-op", "test image-op" > seems to complete successfully. > > This seems odd to me, since the result of the image test is a standalone > program: it doesn't need to be loaded into mkcl: > > ... > > So seems like the program-op should be able to do exactly what the > image-op does, and work correctly. > > > I just tried to have as clean a run at it as I can reasonably have it. > So, from a freshly created directory, I did: > > git clone git://common-lisp.net/projects/mkcl/mkcl.git > <http://common-lisp.net/projects/mkcl/mkcl.git> > > then built it with: (cd mkcl; configure; cd src; make install-local)
Hm. I did a slightly different set of steps: cd mkcl ./configure make sudo make install but these look like they should be equivalent (since I didn't set MKCL). > Followed by: > > git clone git://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/asdf.git > <http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/asdf.git> > > cd asdf; make t l=mkcl > > This resulted in: > > -#--------------------------------------- > Using /home/jean-claude/tmp/ASDF/mkcl/src/bin/mkcl > Ran 56 tests: > 55 passing and 1 failing > failing test(s): test-undeferred-warnings.script > -#--------------------------------------- > > To view full results and failures, try the following command: > less -p ABORTED build/results/mkcl-test.text > make: *** [test-lisp] Error 1 > jean-claude@mars> > > The last line just here above is my normal prompt, so no hang. > As you see I do not reproduce the problem you mentioned. > > BTW, what happens in test-undeferred-warnings seems to be a syntax issue but > I am still unclear about it. What happens here is that there is a function with undeclared local variables, but ASDF is not getting a warning from COMPILE-FILE, so it mistakenly believes the build is successful. I don't think I wrote this test properly, though. In a message crossing with this one, Faré has limited its applicability, but I'm not sure I understand the change. Surely that system should not build successfully? Cheers, r _______________________________________________ Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
