Faré wrote: >> Should we push just asdf-3.2 or also uiop-3.2 (since the new XDG >> functions are properly UIOP)? >> > (I assume you mean *features*) > Actually, I don't think there's anything new asdf that warrants a feature, > so I'd add a uiop feature only (and uiop has evolved enough since 2.27 > that a feature could help, especially considering that at least > quicklisp distributes uiop without asdf). I believe uiop/driver.lisp > is the correct place for the pushnew.
OK. Should we at some point define a stable UIOP feature set, and just bump to 3.0 as a new stable point? cheers, r