Faré wrote: > Oh well, I'm torn. I think it's a good thing, but maybe incompatible > enough that we should release 3.1.5 now and start a 3.2.0 branch.
I don't think this counts as incompatible, since it would only be a STYLE-WARNING (so not break anything). I'm concerned about postponing this because I don't see implementations -- *especially* the commercial ones -- picking up ASDF revisions quickly. So I view ASDF releases as a very finite resource, and one where we have to get the most bang for the buck. I'd rather postpone than push a release out the door, and maybe find it's the only one that the implementations will bundle for this year. Cheers, r > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015, 12:20 Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net > <mailto:rpgold...@sift.net>> wrote: > > About holding the release briefly while I negotiate with Xach about > metadata? > > Xach is starting to make QL complain about systems missing AUTHOR, > DESCRIPTION, and LICENSE. I'm pushing for VERSION, as well. > > I was thinking of adding a new class of STYLE-WARNING for systems that > are missing that metadata. > > Given that it's hard to get ASDF versions into implementations, I'm > considering holding on this briefly. > > I'll put in a topic branch for this. > > cheers, > r >
