Faré wrote: > Dear Robert, > > I believe the plan to enable style-warnings for those using deprecated > functions or missing useful metadata is great, but > 1- justifies moving to version 3.2. > 2- requires testing with a 3.2.0.x alpha release series that already > have a version >= 3.2, so no magic problem occurs due to the change, > as we had with the switch to 3.0.0. > 3- is probably many months away at the current rate. > 3- suggests releasing what we have now as 3.1.5. > > What are your blockers to a 3.1.5 release (besides lots of testing and > corresponding bug fixes)? > > I really believe it would be nice to get the current bug fixes and > clasp support out of the door before then. Last release 3.1.4 was in > October; a lot of small fixes have happened since then, notably fixing > default configuration on many systems, and things like chdir on abcl — > or making asdf and uiop themselves comply with the latest metadata > requirements (note that the test systems don't fulfill them.)
The only blocker I have right now is testing on Windows. The tests pass for me on all the implementations I have on both Linux and Mac OS X. As far as implementations, I don't have clasp, mkcl, Genera, Corman, or ECL, and my clisp is woefully old. But other than that I have pretty good coverage. I'm hoping we can get some Windows tests from Dave Cooper, and if those come through clean, we can release 3.1.5. Cheers, r