On 6/16/15 Jun 16 -2:08 PM, Faré wrote: > Robert, should we export load-asd from asdf?
Yes, that sounds right. I will do so now, unless you want to.... > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves > upon execution. — Robert Sewell > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Mark H. David <m...@yv.org> > Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:05 PM > Subject: Re: why is usocket.asd without an in-package or package qualifiers? > To: Zach Beane <x...@xach.com> > Cc: usocket development <usocket-de...@common-lisp.net> > > > Well, ASDF doc (here: > https://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/asdf/The-defsystem-form.html) is > not that clear about this. It shows an example .asd file, which does > have an in-package, albeit to package asdf-user, and says of it: > > The file starts with an in-package form for package asdf-user. Quick > summary: just do this, because it helps make interactive development > of defsystem forms behave in the same was as when these forms are > loaded by ASDF. ... The in-package form will ensure that the system > definition is read the same as within ASDF when you load it > interactively with cl:load. However, we recommend that you load .asd > files through function asdf::load-asd rather than through cl:load, in > which case this form is unnecessary. > > Don't mean to hijack usocket for ASDF complaints, but shouldn't > asdf::load-asd be exported? > > Thanks, > Mark > > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Zach Beane <x...@xach.com> > To: "Mark H. David" <m...@yv.org> > Cc: usocket development <usocket-de...@common-lisp.net> > Subject: Re: why is usocket.asd without an in-package or package qualifiers? > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:54:36 -0400 > > ASDF establishes a particular environment when using asdf:find-system > and asdf:load-system that is not duplicated by a plain CL:LOAD. It has > always been this way. You cannot reliably use CL:LOAD to load a system > file and have things work. > > Zach > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Mark H. David <m...@yv.org> wrote: > > I notices there's no in-package or qualifiers present in usocket.asd. > So you have to, it seems, do (in-package :asdf) or similar before > loading this file. > Is there any good reason for this? I was thinking of fixing this and > doing a pull request. Anyone against? > Thanks, > Mark >
