>>: Faré >> I think the code is ready for 3.1.6. >> >> I see one regression: logical pathnames on CLISP, that don't play well >> with the newly used temporary file strategy. I propose we punt on that >> test and file a bug against CLISP. Maybe some day CLISP will have new >> maintainers who'll fix it. Anyone who uses logical pathnames DESERVES >> to lose. >>
>:Robert > That sounds great. Would you mind filing a launchpad bug for this, if > there isn't one already, and we can make that the first for 3.1.7.... > > There'll be no action on my end tomorrow or the next day because of the > holiday and a delivery deadline the following day. I'll try to get to > releasing after that. > I filed these: https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1498629 https://sourceforge.net/p/clisp/bugs/677/ I will mark the test as a known failure on clisp, if you want. I don't think it should block the release. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org "Diversity is compulsory along those axes we swear don't matter and strictly forbidden in the one domain that matters, ideology."
