What was the precompilation step? In general, I'd propose a Perl script for everything that involves automatic file processing (it would even be easier to port it to Windows then).
Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> schrieb am Mi., 30. März 2016, 15:02: > The last time I tried it, the build process had been changed to require a > precompilation step for the script runner, and that precompilation step > failed for me. > > Prior to that the lisp-based solution seemed to mostly work, but was not > maintainable by me. ASDF is all I can handle; I need to have a build system > on which I can rely. Admittedly, bash is about the worst programming > language short of INTERCAL, but I can trust bash and make, and there are a > plethora of documentation and code sample resources. I need that. I don't > have the resources to beta test a new scripting framework as part of ASDF > maintenance. > > So those are the symptoms of my allergy. Developing a scripting framework > in CL is a fine project, it's just not MY project. > > Best, > R > > > > > On Mar 28, 2016, at 18:15, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Jens K. Loewe > > <jens.k.lo...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> Going forward, we really need a Windows partner for ASDF. > >> > >> What would be required to fit in? I am still in the learning phase of my > >> CL career, but I'm mainly using Windows for my every day tasks > >> (including programming), so I might try. > > Last I tried, the newfangled way of testing with asdf-tools worked > > well on Windows. It triggers allergy in Robert, but you might want to > > try it. > > > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > http://fare.tunes.org > > Conservative, n.: > > One who admires radicals centuries after they're dead. > > — Leo C. Rosten > > >
