Ouch. Somehow there are duplicates under CLISP indeed. WTF? That might have been one of the reasons the code was factored that way to begin with, for all I remember of the pains of writing UIOP.
Maybe I should keep the remove-duplicates, just use 'equal for physical pathnames and 'pathname-equal for logical pathnames? Maybe only for CLISP? This seems to fix the bug. Should I commit and push? Le Sigh. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Whenever someone asks what I think government rulers should do, my answer is that it should follow the example of the only honest ruler ever, Oedipus: they should apologize for their sins, step down, and gouge their own eyes out. On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote: > On 6/10/16 Jun 10 -8:41 PM, Faré wrote: >> I bumped ASDF to 3.1.7.1 after I fixed a performance bug in >> directory-files that made it quadratic instead of linear, due to some >> remove-duplicates used for logical-pathnames. >> The fix was to only use this quadratic behavior for LPNs. If you use >> LPNs, you deserve to lose on large directories. LPNs are for legacy >> Lisp code with relatively few files, only. >> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• >> http://fare.tunes.org >> The best of all regimes is one where I am the head honcho of a worldwide >> empire. >> — Winston Churchill (his most famous quip, as translated to plain English) >> > > On the Mac, this fails testing on clisp: looks like a regression. See > launchpad ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1592180 > > Looks like maybe there was always a bug here on clisp, but when you took > out the REMOVE-DUPLICATES, you revealed it. > > Please have a look at this, thanks! > r >
