On 8/23/16 Aug 23 -6:42 AM, Elias Pipping wrote: > If we can agree on Robert’s unsupported-functionality error class, I’ll work > that into the merge request, too.
I have a busy day today, but I will try to get it done. I was thinking of having slots for: - implementation - capability name - optional format control and format args that the programmer can use to provide additional information. E.g., for LW, say that it's for licensing reasons that the DELIVER capability is not available. If this sounds reasonable, I'll put it in, and try to find places it should be used. In an earlier email, Elias points out that there are related reasons why a function might have failed. I haven't had time to figure out whether these would call for additional condition classes. R
