On 9/13/16 Sep 13 -2:50 AM, Elias Pipping wrote: >>> >> - SBCL 1.1.13 now fails plenty of tests (11 to be precise). SBCL 1.3.9 >>> >> and later are fine(++) >> > >> > The last time I checked SBCL 1.3.9 (really a candidate for release), it >> > failed because of some pathname-printing code. Passes for me now on Mac >> > and Linux. > That was a regression that they fixed prior to the 1.3.9 release, > fortunately. I just wanted to point out here that so far rather old sbcl > releases worked perfectly well and now they don’t. Might be worth > investigating what changed. >
Do you have any error logs you could post? For example to launchpad? WRT mkcl, I'm going to let this slide. I am already tracking it from git, which I don't do for most other implementations.x I can't afford the complexity of tracking multiple git repositories. According to the page at common-lisp.net, the gitlab repository is the official one, so I will stick to that. So my understanding of what needs investigation is: 1. What's going on with the new Windows failures. 2. What's going on with the newly introduced issues on older versions of SBCL. Best, r
