On 11/27/16 Nov 27 -1:11 PM, Faré wrote: > I asked you many times if you knew what you were doing, but I don't > think you did wrong at any point, except maybe for not realizing you > had changed plan. [Also, I'm a proponent of releasing more often, but > that's a different debate.] > > I'd like to proceed forward. I don't any good reason to undo any of > the current changes.
Well, as my earlier message suggests, we don't have to undo anything: we can simply make a release out of the state before the removal of operation initargs. That would give everyone time to adjust. I think the person who cares the most is Daniel, so Daniel, what do you say? > > If you want to keep supporting make-build and/or if Daniel wants to > support it on the ECL side, that's possible (see my proposed > reimplementation in comments to !34). I'm not aware of any other > breakage. > > Anton, can you run cl-test-grid with ASDF master? > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > Communism is feudality without chivalry. — Faré > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote: >> This is clearly my fault. I lost track of the plan. Going forward, I need to >> get a better handle on plans -- I've been to reactive, having discussions >> spread across launchpad, GitLab, IRC, and the mailing list. >> >> Here's one proposal: instead of reverting the recent merge, we could cut a >> release off master before the merge. That would give us a less disruptive >> release (at the expense of a little complexity on the release branch). >> >> Would this make everyone happy? >
