On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Stelian Ionescu <sione...@cddr.org> wrote: >>> Stelian, how sad would you be if you have to segregate >>> defsystem-depends-on to refer to systems in separate files? > > I would be quite sad, because from my point of view as a user the whole point > of the slash-systems was to have all systems in a library in a single file. > That said, it's mostly an æsthetic concern, I can live with it. > OK, I'll try harder and see if I can salvage this feature somehow. Sigh.
> I suppose this shows one more time the limits of the naively parsing .asd > files using CL:EVAL. One can't easily do a two-pass evaluation of the > definitions therein. > Well, you know the saying: "if it's not backwards, it's not compatible." Using CL:LOAD was "the simplest thing that works", and it's hard to restrict things after the fact. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org I have never killed any one, but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction. — Clarence Darrow
