PS: SBCL 1.1.16 and later don't have this error. In 1.1.11 sb-posix.asd contains full system definition, while in 1.1.16 sb-posix.asd contains just one line: (defsystem :sb-posix :class require-system), so I think ASDF just doesn't try to signal the warning.
- ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candidate Robert Goldman
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candidate Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candidate Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candidate Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candidate Faré
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release candid... Faré
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 release c... gwking - metabang
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 relea... Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Attila Lendvai
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Faré
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Faré
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Attila Lendvai
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Faré
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Anton Vodonosov
- Re: ASDF 3.1.7.43 is 3.2 r... Faré