On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote: > On 6/26/17 Jun 26 -10:07 AM, Faré wrote: >> No, you're right that files from :read-file-form and :read-file-line >> perfectly fit as INPUT-FILES for DEFINE-OP. I haven't given any >> thought on whether it's easy or hard to properly inject them as >> results of INPUT-FILES. >> >> NB: I don't have much cycles for ASDF at the moment, but I will gladly >> review patches or fix urgent bugs. > > I'll try to get a patch done sometime this week. I think I should just > base the topic branch off the plan branch, right? >> >> PS: What do you think about releasing ASDF 3.3 after next month, just >> taking steps to avoid escalating from WARNING to STYLE-WARNING until >> next release? > > 3.3 being the "plan branch," right? I think it sounds good, as long as > my machines can get in some quality time running the test suite ;-) > Yes, you can either use the "plan" branch directly, or start a new branch off of it if you're not too sure.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Without education, we are in a horrible and deadly danger of taking educated people seriously. — G. K. Chesterton
