Aren't you working on the first release in many years? That might be a good time to define some feature.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017, 11:08 Sam Steingold <s...@gnu.org> wrote: > > * Faré <snu...@tznvy.pbz> [2017-08-01 10:07:33 -0400]: > > > >> To mark a generic function as user-extendable, one can now use a > >> declaration: > >> > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > >> (defgeneric perform (...) > >> (declare #+clisp (dynamically-modifiable)) > >> ...) > >> (defgeneric operation-done-p (...) > >> (declare #+clisp (dynamically-modifiable)) > >> ...) > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > >> > >> The declaration is now in `hg tip` (but has not been released yet). > >> > > Will that declaration cause a warning or error on older versions of > > clisp? If yes, what read-time conditional more precise than #+clisp > > can I use to only enable on recent enough versions of clisp? > > My first reaction was > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (declaim (declaration dynamically-modifiable)) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > but for some reason it does not work with defgeneric. > Sorry. > > -- > Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504 > http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net > http://www.memritv.org > https://jihadwatch.org http://camera.org http://jij.org > Only a fool has no doubts. >
