I believe this upgrade issue is the problem that was fixed in 432061d72e839873f0a28d121392fbc468a53ed6, part of the upcoming 3.3.1 release. Sorry about that.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Socialism: turning people into cuckolds by making them aspire to becoming cuckoos and believe they are. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Florian Margaine <flor...@margaine.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Le 7 nov. 2017 12:24 AM, "Vince" <vinc...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Now the reason I want to do this is that it looks like my last solution > to build an executable with ECL (I'd like to build a smaller executable > than with SBCL). I was hit by the fact that ASDF did not ship > make-build, which is the build procedure documented by ECL. > Other options like program-op are not really documented either. > I explained and keep track of the issue here: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46520876/building-an-executable-with-ecl-missing-dependency-or-can-not-find-make-build-i > :) > > > I did something similar in a side project a few weeks ago, see the Makefile > and the build.lisp file in there: https://gitlab.com/ralt/niboot > > > Regards, > > Vincent > > > > Cheers, > Florian
