On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote: > Thank you very much, Anton. Question: is the inner-conditional-test failure > on SBCL 1.3.21 not a regression? I just loaded this system and tested it on > my mac with SBCL 1.4.3, and it worked fine, so I'm inclined to treat this is > not a problem. Also, the inner conditional system has a readme saying it's > not maintained and please not to use it. > > What about reversi on CCL 1.9? I guess if I understand correctly, reversi > must have passed on CCL 1.10 and 1.11, so probably I shouldn't worry about > this, either. > > Fare, what do you think? Should I release this version, or wait a little > longer and see if we can get the syntax fix in, as well? > I think we're good for 3.3.2. There are often a few non-reproducible failures and failures on older implementations, and I see nothing worrisome there, even though I haven't tried to rerun the crashes and timeouts in case their work the second time around.
> Maybe I should release this as 3.3.2, and make the syntax-fixed version of > ASDF be 3.4, since (for some people) it might be a bigger change. > Yes, that might be prudent. When you make a 3.4, be sure to test cl-test-grid with a branch that includes the version update, because that's how you'll find problems with deprecated functions (for which you should make sure to bump the expiration date properly). —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Whatever is worth doing at all is worth doing well. — Chesterfield