Thanks for the great suggestions, Richard! I'll definitely give it a try!

Blake

------- Original Message -------
On Saturday, September 23rd, 2023 at 3:48 PM, Richard Westhaver 
<richard.westha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Blake,
>
> I am relatively new to Common Lisp and agree that figuring out a decent dev 
> ecosystem can be challenging, the suggestions above are the best portable 
> solution IMO though - using SBCL, I added a single line to ~/.sbclrc : (push 
> #P"~/dev/" ql:*local-project-directories*).
>
> I think scaling this to really large and distributed systems is a challenge 
> though - you basically have ASDF and Quicklisp and it's up to you how you 
> want to make use of them. here's a couple ways I've seen others manage this:
>
> - fukamachi's qlot: https://github.com/fukamachi/qlot - project-local library 
> installer, currently being integrated into the Lem text editor
> - nyxt (just use sub-repos): 
> https://github.com/atlas-engineer/nyxt/tree/master/_build
>
> It's Lisp so the perfect solution for your purposes does in fact exist, you 
> just gotta start hacking :).
>
> For example, I'm currently working on a very different approach which may not 
> pay off - dropping Quicklisp and all external dependencies, [ab]using the 
> compiler (SBCL) as much as possible and adding contribs which are distributed 
> with the compiler instead of separate systems.
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 10:56 AM Blake McBride <bl...@mcbridemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all of the replies! Although I have been playing with Lisp for 
>> many years, I do not have much experience with ASDF or QuickLisp.
>>
>> I appreciate all of the suggestions and explanations, however, with respect, 
>> they all seem like work-arounds or hacks for my purposes. I am not 
>> suggesting, however, that your input wasn't valid, helpful, or there is a 
>> better way.
>>
>> I understand the idea that QuickLisp is not a package manager but a system 
>> manager. In that case, it delivers completed system easily and conveniently. 
>> It's a great tool.
>>
>> I think a true package manager option in QuickLisp would be incredibly 
>> useful. Here is the scenario.
>>
>> I am building a system. It has dependencies X, Y, and Z. I complete my 
>> system and package it up as a QuickLisp system. Later, I'd like to work on 
>> my system. I'd like to work on a local copy in a directory of my choosing. 
>> I'd like it to load its dependencies (X, Y, and Z) yet work on my part of 
>> the system without loading the version in the QuickLisp repo.
>>
>> While some of your suggestions will allow me to do that, they are real 
>> clunky. Either I have to work in specific directories or I have to have 
>> special code specific to the particular directory I choose to work in.
>>
>> All of this is contrary to the way all other system I've used work. In 
>> general, I can clone a repo to any directory and do:
>>
>> ./configure
>> make
>> sudo make install
>>
>> and it works! I can put the clone anywhere I want. I can change it anyway I 
>> want. The system doesn't fight me.
>>
>> I wouldn't think this would be hard at all to make ASDF and QuickLisp have 
>> this capability.
>>
>> Blake McBride

Reply via email to