On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: > I'm open to an ASDF history section being added to the manual, or a separate > ASDF history web page being added that would be linked from index.html. > > But I'm not open to doing this myself! I would accept a PR. > > Actually, isn't this information available in some of the ILC papers? If so, > isn't that sufficient?
A historical writeup is right up my alley. I think it can bind together the information that was in the ILC papers. Is a doc/history.md page alright, similar to the best_practices.md document? Should I remove the information from the index.html page as I put it in history.md, leaving a link to the new document instead? I'm thinking particularly of the pseudo-changelog at the bottom of the page, but also part of the documentation section, and the discussion of obsolete alternatives (a lot of it currently commented out, but I intend to move it all to the new document and uncomment the stuff there, maybe in a different subsection). —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org “Each party only has to LOOK better than the other before the vote. After, it can BE worse. Then the other only has to compete with THAT. Lather, rinse, repeat...”
