Hello all,

I am just wondering if aspseek has any problems following nested frames?
We have a very high structured frame-concept behind
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/ (german, development ;)

Search is done on http://roadrunner.bswp.de/cgi-bin/s.cgi.

But if I state the above URL (tom.*) as a Server directive in
aspseek.conf I only get the following files indexed:

http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/robots.txt
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/head.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/start/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/status.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/start/nav1.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/start/index2.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/style.css
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/impressum/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/aktuelles/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/einmaleins/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/foerdermittel/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/interessenvertretung/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/tippstricks/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/adressen/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/surftipps/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/suchen/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/kontakt/index.html
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/start/nav2.html 
http://tom.bartels-schoene.de/jugendpolitik/start/c_start.html

All index.html-files there are new frameset-definitions which don't get
indexed. 

Any idea why? Or do I have to configure that behaviour somehow? (I just
changed DB, CharSets and Server directives by now...

Regards from Muenster/Germany

     Balu

PS: Is it because the filenames in the index.html-files are always the
same (nav1.html & index2.html), nah - that can't be be, or?
-- 
"Linux is like a fractal: No matter how deep you go, there's always
more!" [Casey Bralla, 24.01.2001 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Reply via email to