Hello Matt, Deletion code is robust enough. If one URL is deleted and added again or vise versa then only last action is taken into account. This achieved by comparison of offsets for the same URLs in delta file and taking only the last entry.
Alexander. Matt Sullivan �����(�): > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Alexander F Avdonkin wrote: > > > John Pinochet �����(�): > > > > > Does ./index -Cf filename.txt > > > > > > Remove all URLs contained in filename.txt from the database? What do I have > > > to do from the mySQL end? I can remove all info from all aspseek tables, > > > but I'm concerned about aspseek/var.... > > > > No, you can use only index -C -u<SQL_mask> > > Actually, I'm working on adding support for -f now, file will be a list of URLs > and or URL (SQL) masks. I'll also add two options reusing deprecated options > -d and -k. Option -d will prevent delta rebuild (see below) and -k is intended > for low priority deletes. Any problems with me reusing those two? Patch to > come shortly. > > Kir / Alexander ... how robust is the deletion code? Specifically, do the > delta files handle both addition and deletion of URLs. Assume the following > scenario; indexing for short periods during the night, terminated with -E and > deltas rebuilt with -D specifically. During the day URLs are deleted as > requested with an option (-d) to prevent deltas from being rebuilt (since we > don't want that extra overhead during peak query times) and it doesn't matter > if URLs don't actually dissapear until the -D rebuild after the indexing that > night. > > This means that aspseek/deltas must cope with both deletes and additions. > > Figured you'd probably be able to give me a quick answer otherwise I'll poke at > the internals of the aspseek/deltas more thoroughly. > > Matt. > > > > > > > > > > JP > > > Santiago > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Kir Kolyshkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 12:42 AM > > > Subject: Re: [aseek-users] Any successful runs on Solaris 8 ? > > > > > > > Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hikmet Salih Ozkan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been trying ASPseek on several Solaris boxes (all sun sparc) > > > > > > and I was never able to get a successful indexing, always had bus > > > errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone who has successfully installed and is now running > > > > > > ASPseek on a sun solaris 8 box ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I would very much appreciate any help. > > > > > > > > > > Actually developers don't have access to Solaris so we can't guarantee > > > it will > > > > > work (although we are trying to make it work, only in theory). > > > > > > > > I mean - a little can be done without access to the target platform... > > > > > > > > -- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 7551596 Phone +7 903 6722750 > > > > Hard work may not kill you, but why take chances? > > > > -- > > > > > >
