I've been able to compile from CVS in Redhat 8, 9 and RH Enterprise v2 The only problem I had was running cvsprep. Only on the machine running RH8 I was able to prepare sources for instalation (read documentation on autoconf version requirements), the resulting set then compiled flawlessly under all red hat flavors. I'm not getting seg faults and it's pretty stable. I also linked the fcgi libraries for sc.c => the s.cgi binary so it works much much faster now.
Rand, what happens when you try to compile under OS X? what errors do you get? Try compiling from the current CVS and use an older autoconf when running cvsprep (2.53 worked for me) 2.57 failed but instructions clearly state to use 2.50. I then compiled (removed the -g flags) and installed with install-strip ----- Original Message ----- From: "rand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 12:51 AM Subject: Re: [aseek-users] CVS, Compilation, FastCGI and ASPSeek > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jesus Altuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:52:48 -0400 > Subject: [aseek-users] CVS, Compilation, FastCGI and ASPSeek > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi List, > > I've succesfully linked, tested and compiled (in a production > environment) the s.cgi binary with FastCGI support, including some > small modifications to correct problems when printing return headers > in a persisten environment. What is the official way to submit user > contributed modifications?. > > Is ASPSeek still been actively developed? I want to sell a search > appliance using ASPSeek, Who would be the person to discuss ASPSeek > commercial licensing? > > Thanks > > Yay, activity! > I've been trying to get ASPSeek running in osx, but I doubt I will be > able to, I to would love to know if it's still being actively > developed > > rand >
