Sauvik, this email list is watched by many competing ASN.1 compiler vendors.
We cannot discuss weaknesses of a particular vendor here. Please contact
the OSS technical support directly.
Sauvik, Chakraborty (Chakraborty)** CTR ** wrote:
Hi Olivier,
Thanks for the suggestion.
But can you tell me that while decoding, does the ossDecode() takes extra
time if the TRACES are ON, like the following example:
I mean do the 'fieldcount', 'index' etc info which come in [] , contribute
for more time in decoding ?
....
DL-DCCH-Message SEQUENCE [fieldcount (not encoded) = 1]
message DL-DCCH-MessageType CHOICE [index = 8]
....
Thanks,
Sauvik.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Dubuisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:54 PM
To: Sauvik, Chakraborty (Chakraborty)** CTR **
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ASN1] About macro TYPE notation
Sauvik, Chakraborty (Chakraborty)** CTR ** wrote:
Hi all,
I have got a problem while using ossDecode() function.
As u know that the function has the syntax like the following:
ossDecode(world, &pduNum, &RRCencodedBuffer, pdu);
Now since the RRCencodedBuffer is of very large size, it takes more
time(more than 2 min.) to decode the entire stuff and that results in the
failure in one of our tests.
Can anyone have any pointer if this can be avoided anyway, I mean like
using
any flags/options or reducing some traces to work faster ?
This list is vendor-agnostic. Please send your question to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Lev Walkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
ASN1 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.asn1.org/mailman/listinfo/asn1
