I would say it should be enough! But it is assumed that your compiler knows
how to deal with the ROSE OPERATION and ERROR object classes...so it will
certainly need the ROSE definitions!
regards,
Bruno KONIK - uniGone
Tel : +33 (0)1 60 12 77 64
Fax : +33 (0)1 60 12 77 65
41-43 rue de Cronstadt - 75015 PARIS FRANCE
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.unigone.com
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
St�phane Leibovitsch
Envoy� : mardi 7 novembre 2000 08:52
� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [ASN.1] A problem with the OPERATION keyword
"Bruno.Konik" wrote:
>
> Hello St�phane,
>
> I don't see your attached file but I know that CSTA phase II still uses
X208
> ASN.1 macros. These macros should be transformed into Information Object
> Class (X680 syntax). I have the following suggestion :
>
> Definitions like this one for alternateCall :
>
> alternateCall OPERATION
> ARGUMENT AlternateCallArgument
> RESULT AlternateCallResult
> ERRORS {universalFailure}
> ::= 1
>
> ..should be transformed into :
>
> alternateCall OPERATION ::=
> {
> ARGUMENT AlternateCallArgument
> RESULT AlternateCallResult
> ERRORS {universalFailure}
> CODE local : 1
> }
>
> it is the same thing for the ERROR macro that should be transformed into :
>
> universalFailure ERROR ::=
> {
> PARAMETER UniversalFailure
> CODE local : 1
> }
>
> I hope that this could help you...
>
Thanks ! So will I need to change anything else or is it enough ? I must
say that I am an absolute beginner in ASN.1 ....
--
St�phane Leibovitsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
