Have you-all checked the formal model Annex? That is where the scope
rules were inserted.
John L
Bancroft Scott wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Egon Andersen, Talura wrote:
>
> > I've been looking at the following construction.
> >
> > ---
> > alpha INTEGER { a (1) } ::= 3
> > beta INTEGER { alpha (7) } ::= alpha
> > ---
> >
> > What is the value of beta? 3 or 7? 'alpha' can be regarded as both a
> > DefinedValue and an identifier. Both types are defined with different
> > named values and different names for named values. I can't see that
> > any rule is violated. Nor any rules saying which of the two values is
> > assigned to 'beta' I'm specially looking at X.680 (1997 E) clause
> > 18.10 (including NOTE) and X.680 (1997 E)/Amd.2 (1999 E) clause F.4.5
>
> The answer is that beta is 7, same as you would get for
>
> alpha INTEGER { a (1) } ::= 3
> Foo ::= INTEGER { alpha (7) }
> beta Foo ::= alpha
>
> We will clarify this in ASN.1:2002.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bancroft Scott Toll Free :1-888-OSS-ASN1
> OSS Nokalva International:1-732-302-0750
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tech Support :1-732-302-9669 x-1
> 1-732-302-9669 x-200 Fax :1-732-302-0023
> http://www.oss.com
--
Prof John Larmouth
1 Blueberry Road [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowdon Tel: +44 161 928 1605
Cheshire WA14 3LS Fax: +44 161 928 8069
England
