Hi, It is one of the correct results if - the INTEGER is not implicitly tagged (and in automatic tagging it IS even if taggs are not seen directly in the text) - the coder uses the short length format
But other correct results also exists like (again, no tagging is considered) 02 81 02 FE D4 Best Regards, Gy�rgy ============================================ dr. Gy�rgy R�THY Ericsson Communications Systems Hungary Lim. Conformance Center tel.: +36 1 437-7006; fax: +36 1 437-7767 mobile: +36 30 297-7862 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.r.eth.ericsson.se/~ethgry ============================================ >-----Original Message----- >From: Steen Oluf Karlsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:59 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [ASN.1] Signed Integer Encoding > > >Its twos complement coded ! >Steen O Karlsen > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Sathya[IT] >Sent: 18. oktober 2001 16:03 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [ASN.1] Signed Integer Encoding > > >Hi, > >I have one fundamental question. Can anyone verify the representation >of an INTEGER value of -300 in BER > >02 + 02 + FED4 > >regards, > >Sathya Narayanan S >RPG Cellular Services Limited >GSM : +91 98410 48051 > >
