Hi, No, not at all. I would say quite the opposit. Automatic tagging works only on types, which does not contain "hand-written" tags. If textual taggs are removed from a module, automatic tagging may allocate a different tag to components of SEQUENCEs, SETs or alternatives of CHOICEs as the textual tag was. This may cause a different re-ordering of SET components or CHOICE alternatives as it would be with textual taggs and spoile encoding.
This is a different issue, that there may be modules not using automatic tagging but tagged quite the same way manually as the automatic mechanism would do. By the way it is unimportant from this point of view if the encoding is aligned or unaligned. Best Regards, Gy�rgy ============================================ dr. Gy�rgy R�THY Ericsson Communications Systems Hungary Lim. Conformance Center tel.: +36 1 437-7006; fax: +36 1 437-7767 mobile: +36 30 297-7862 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.r.eth.ericsson.se/~ethgry ============================================ >-----Original Message----- >From: Krishna Reddy Gaddam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:58 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: [ASN.1] AUTOMATIC Tagging and Unaligned-PER > > >Hi All > >Is it correct to say : >-------------------- >If an ASN.1 module header says AUTOMATIC TAGS, >the Unaligned-PER encoder need not bother to look into the any >of the TAGS >in the whole module. > >Other way of saying : >--------------------- >Is the module is just equivalent to all the TAGS removed from >the module ? > > >Please clarify. > >Thanks in advance. > >Regards >Krishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >
