|
Hi,
I have come across the following definition in a
spec which I believe to be legal:
MAP-AcceptInfo ::= SEQUENCE
{
..., extensionContainer ExtensionContainer OPTIONAL -- extensionContainer must not be used in version 2 } Yet, this does not seem parsable by the rules as
currently stated in X.680.
When decomposed, the rule for SequenceType
would appear to have only two possibilities for a type starting with an
extension marker:
SEQUENCE { ExtensionAndException
OptionalExtensionMarker }
or (via ComponentTypeLists):
SEQUENCE { ExtensionAndException ExtensionAdditions
ExtensionEndMarker , RootComponentTypeList }
It does not appear that either of these allows the
above construct to be handled. Is the type definition wrong or are the
rules wrong or am I missing something? (and yes, I went back to read the
Corrigenda to see if this was corrected anywhere).
Regards,
Ed Day
Principal Engineer Objective Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (484) 875-3020 (main) (610) 608-4930 (mobile) (610) 321-0361 (fax) (877) 307-6855 (toll-free) |
- Re: [ASN.1] Is this a legal SEQUENCE ? Ed Day
- Re: [ASN.1] Is this a legal SEQUENCE ? Egon Andersen, Talura
- RE: [ASN.1] Is this a legal SEQUENCE ? Gyorgy Rethy (ETH)
- Re: [ASN.1] Is this a legal SEQUENCE ? Egon Andersen, Talura
- Re: [ASN.1] Is this a legal SEQUENCE ? DUBUISSON Olivier
- RE: [ASN.1] Is this a legal SEQUENCE ? Gyorgy Rethy (ETH)
