Hah! Well, maybe when OSS completes their XML Encoding Rules components they will be willing to run their tests using XER and CXER and report their results here.
Phil Paul Long wrote: > > Phil, > > Yes, but Brian has a valid point in his response on the Megaco reflector, > although I think he is grasping at straws. Basically, he says that the > reason binary looks so good is that the programmers at OSS are just a lot > better at writing optimized code in general than those at Erlang. :-) > Presumably, if the same effort were applied to text, the text encoding would > perform better than the binary. (...ah, it never ends...) > > Paul Long > ipDialog, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil > > Griffin > > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:55 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [ASN.1] Binary vs Text > > > > > > Thought this would be interesting, though it > > didn't appear to be so until I followed the > > link. Very compelling reasons to consider > > compact binary encodings over verbose text. > > Binary appears to be both smaller and faster > > to process for these test cases. > > > > Phil
