Paul Thorpe wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Egon Andersen, Talura wrote:
> 
> > Paul Thorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Egon,
> > >
> > > You have the latest version (pre-published).  The only
> > > changes that will be made before publication are that the
> > > cross-references will be updated to point to clauses in the ASN.1
> > > 2002 edition.
> > >
> > Thanks, but that is actually in contradiction to the message I got when
> > I sent a defect report on the document related to clause 9.4, where
> > "xmlhstring" will give a non-unique encoding.
> > So I'm a little confused.
> 
> There was an editorial omission in 9.3.1 and in 9.4 which will be in the
> published version.  Add "with all white-space removed" to the end of
> 9.3.1, and add "with all white-space removed, and all letters in
> upper-case" to the end of 9.4.
> 
I would prefere 'over-decadic hexadecimal digits' instead of 'letters'.
(BEEF will mean different things, either re-cycled bits or something
eatable.)
Furthermore I think we still have a problem, if the number of
hexadecimal digits is an odd number. 1FF and 1FF0 shall be interpreted
the same, according to X.680 (2002) 22.8.
I think we have to restrict the number of hexadecimal digits to be: "not
an odd number of hexadecimal digits".
(And now when I read 22.8 again, the wording '... is not an even number
...' may be better if it was written: '... is an odd number ...',
because the number 0 (zero) is sometimes debated whether it is an even
number or not! As I remember it, 0 (zero) is not an even number in the
strict mathematical sence.)


Best regards
Egon Andersen


-- 
* Talura ApS      * Phone: +45 43 52 50 00 *
* Baldersh�j 24 B * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* DK-2635  Ish�j  * http://www.talura.dk   *

Reply via email to