Hi every body,
do you remember this subject?
[ASN.1] few questions regarding the BER implementaion of MAP-GSM ASN.1 me
ssages.
I find Egon gave a nice answer. But I find the very last question (which
remained unanswered) very nice too.
Santhosh Kumar wrote:
> Assume that We are not planning to add any private extensions at this
> point.
>
> Q1)In that case, Can i just treat the extension container definition as
> one single extension marker definition?.
Now my question is: if somebody wants to keep every thing small and
simple AND he knows that he won't have any extensions he could rewrite
the whole thing in this way:
ExtensionContainer ::= SEQUENCE
{
privateExtensionList [0] PrivateExtensionList OPTIONAL,
pcs-Extensions [1] PCS-Extensions OPTIONAL,
...
}
PrivateExtensionList ::= SEQUENCE SIZE(1..maxNumOfPrivateExtensions)
OF PrivateExtension
PrivateExtension ::= SEQUENCE
{
...
}
PCS-Extensions ::= SEQUENCE
{
...
}
That means, I do not intend to encode private extensions. And I will
ignore those of other people.
Am I right? Or only a lazy simplifier?
Best regards
Simin
__________________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
M�chten Sie mit einem Gru� antworten? http://grusskarten.yahoo.de
