is that in the case of :
&ResultType DEFAULT NULL, &result-if-error &ResultType DEFAULT NULL,
is the right writing according to b) above since NULL is
the value of
NULL type. I don't see why adding "NULL" or " : NULL".
I have the same reading of 9.8 and agree with your rationale.
Do you know if this feature (DEFAULT for variable-type-value fields) has been used in actual ASN.1 specifications? If yes, which notation has been used?
We are searching the module database of the ITU-T ASN.1 Project (http://www.itu.int/itu-t/asn1/database/). I'll get back to you as soon as the result is available.
--
Olivier DUBUISSON
france telecom R&D
DTL/TAL - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France t: +33 2 96 05 38 50 - f: +33 2 96 05 39 45 - http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/
